The introduction of massage therapy apprenticeship programs in Arkansas has demonstrated many drawback—especially when it comes to the erosion of state autonomy and the unintended consequences it could have on both students and the workforce.
The Shifting Oversight and Erosion of State Autonomy
One of the most troubling aspects of Arkansas’s apprenticeship programs is the loss of oversight and state control. The Earn & Learn Act of 2021 sought to create a pathway for individuals to gain skills and earn a paycheck simultaneously. However, the structure of these apprenticeship programs has resulted in a shifting of responsibility away from the state’s Department of Health to the Federal Office of Apprenticeships instead. While this may seem like a practical solution on the surface, it has led to a confusing and inconsistent regulatory environment.
The Department of Health and the Massage Therapy Technical Advisory Committee's oversight is limited and lacks the necessary teeth to ensure that these apprenticeship programs are being run effectively. The slight oversight exercised by the Department primarily involves background checks and issuing learner permits, but it stops short of providing real regulatory approval and enforcement. With no strong state authority, it feels like Arkansas is abdicating responsibility and handing over control to the program operators—creating an environment ripe for exploitation.
The Competency-Based Structure: An Incomplete Education Model
The apprenticeship model in Arkansas is designed to be competency-based, requiring apprentices to complete 2,000 hours of on-the-job training, meet six competencies, and undergo at least 500 hours of supplemental coursework. While this structure may seem appealing at first glance, it glosses over the critical aspects of a comprehensive education in massage therapy.
In an apprenticeship, apprentices progress based on the number of competencies they complete, but this approach lacks the rigorous, well-rounded education provided by traditional schools. The focus on meeting competencies and accumulating hours may work for some, but it could leave others with insufficient training. With only minimal course requirements dictated by the state and a progressive pay scale based on the completion of competencies, this model risks treating apprentices more like employees rather than students learning a craft. This focus on productivity over learning undermines the quality of education, leaving students with gaps in their knowledge and skills.
The Dangers of Financial Burdens
One of the most alarming drawbacks of apprenticeship programs is the potential financial trap they create for apprentices. While apprentices are able to earn money while learning, this comes with significant risks. If an apprentice is unable to complete the training or pass the licensing exam, they are financially on the hook for the fees owed to their program. This creates a scenario where individuals could end up in a form of “indentured servitude,” saddled with debt without any real guarantee of success.
These financial pressures are even more concerning when you consider the fact that Arkansas has seen fringe groups pushing for the development of a "state test" as an alternative to the more rigorous and nationally recognized MBLEx exam. This could further lower standards and open the door to unqualified practitioners flooding the market, all while students bear the financial burden of incomplete training or failed exams.
Rural Areas: False Hope for Underserved Communities
While some argue that apprenticeships are an ideal solution for underserved regions, especially in areas like SouthWest Arkansas, where there is a lack of licensed massage therapists and schools, this approach seems more like false hope than a real solution. Apprenticeships have not emerged in regions where massage therapy schools are already absent. Instead of pouring resources into creating real educational opportunities—such as opening new schools or training more instructors—Arkansas seems content with offering a half-baked alternative that fails to address the root of this problem.
By focusing on apprenticeship programs as a quick fix, the state risks further neglecting the need for a robust and accessible educational infrastructure. In underserved areas, what’s really needed is investment in traditional massage therapy schools and instructors. Not a lower-quality, alternative pathway to licensure.
The Blurred Lines of Apprenticeships
Another significant issue with Arkansas’s apprenticeship program is the unclear and inconsistent oversight of who apprentices are learning from and training with. While the Department of Health lists six approved programs and one sponsor, there is little transparency regarding the number or quality of mentors and supervisors. The apprenticeship model essentially allows employers, such as Massage Envy, to run their own programs, which could potentially lead to conflicts of interest or a diluted educational experience for apprentices. (It was the son of a Massage Envy owner who introduced the Earn & Learn act in the Arkansas Legislature four years ago.)
Traditional schools are also adopting apprenticeship models, with many now offering both models of education. The result is a loss of balance between structured classroom learning and hands-on experience. The quality of mentorship and supervision in these programs is a key concern—without clear standards for what constitutes a qualified mentor, apprentices may find themselves underprepared and without the comprehensive education they need to succeed.
For years, the Massage Therapy Technical Advisory Committee has gotten unclear answers from representatives of the Federal Office of Apprenticeships on how these programs are structured, approved, and inspected. Even more confusing are responses from those operating such programs.
The Decline of State Control and the Need for Rigorous Standards
Ultimately, the introduction of apprenticeship programs in Arkansas represents a troubling shift away from state control and toward a more privatized, profit-driven approach to education. The state’s role in regulating and overseeing massage therapy education is at risk of diminishing, with apprenticeship programs offering a less rigorous, less standardized path to licensure. While some individuals may benefit from this pathway, the risks—including financial instability, a subpar education, and the erosion of state standards—are significant.
If Arkansas is truly committed to creating a skilled and competent workforce, it must refocus on strengthening traditional educational models, ensuring that schools maintain high standards, and restoring a stronger, more active role for the state in overseeing these programs. The current nationwide trend toward apprenticeships could end up doing more harm than good if these issues are not addressed, ultimately leaving both students and consumers at risk.
Peace and Healing,
Kirby Clark Ellis, MTI, BCTMB
Comments